Appendix A Key Personnel and Responsibilities
-
System Owner Redbridge Borough Council
System owner
London Borough of Redbridge
PO Box 2
Ilford Town Hall
Ilford
Essex
IG1 1DD
The London Borough of Redbridge is the owner of the system. Its’ nominee is Sasha Taylor, Head of Community Protection and Licensing
Sasha Taylor and Group Manager of Community and Consumer Protection, CCTV & Licensing, Hayley Roberts.
Head of Community Protection and Licensing
Sasha.taylor@redbridge.gov.uk
Key Responsibilities:
- Ensuring compliance with the objective of the system and for ensuring effective management of it. Including maintenance of the integrity and security of the policy and the protection of the rights of the public and the individual.
- Production and implementation of a written policy, including consultation with the users of the scheme and provision for the release of information relating to the operation of the system.
- To amend or change the policy in the light of operational experience or changes to the system.
- Ensuring that complaints are dealt with in an efficient and effective manner.
- Ensuring the provision and maintenance of all equipment forming part of the system in accordance with contractual arrangements that the owners may from time to time enter into.
- Ensuring that the interests of the owner and other organisations are upheld in accordance with this code of practice.
- In partnership with the Ilford police, agree any proposed alterations and additions to the system, this code and the procedural manual.
For the general management of the system, responsibility is delegated to the CCTV manager, see below.
-
CCTV System Manager
Foyce Ali is the CCTV Manager and data controller, the CCTV Manager is the single point of reference for the overall responsibility for the system, day-to-day responsibility and control of the system and ensuring that the code of practice is complied with.
Foyce Ali
CCTV and Parking Enforcement Manager
foyce.ali@redbridge.gov.uk
Responsible for providing strategic direction for:
- liaison with the partners and users of the system,
- release of data to third parties who have a legal right for copies,
- security clearance of visitors,
- security clearance of persons who request to view data.
- Responsibility for the implementation of procedures to ensure that the system operates according to the purposes for which it was installed and in accordance with the objectives identified for the system.
- observance of the policy and procedural practices
- security and storage of data
- maintenance of the quality of the recording and monitoring equipment
- compliance with this code and operational procedures. Disciplinary procedures will be taken against Officers in matters relating to non-compliance and breaches of confidentiality or the unauthorised release of data.
Shift Supervision
- The CCTV Manager is responsible for ensuring that the system is operated in accordance with the policy and all procedural instructions relating to it.
- At all times ensuring that Officers carry out their duties in an efficient and responsible manner in accordance with the objectives of the scheme, including regular checks and audit trails to ensure that the documentation system in place are working effectively. These should include: the evidence register, Officer's log, incident log, witness statements, faults and maintenance records, security of data and, authorised visitors.
- The CCTV Manager shall ensure that all Officers carry out their duties in accordance with good practice and that they comply with health and safety requirements.
- CCTV Team Responsibilities
3.1 Control Room Operations
Sameer Sheikh, Senior CCTV Officer is the single point of reference in relation to operational issues.
The role will include a responsibility to:
- Ensure the operational effectiveness and efficiency of the CCTV System based on intelligence and Weekly Tasking; the deployment of dynamic cameras to deliver key objectives and problem solving outcomes
- Agree to any proposed alterations and additions to the CCTV System, this Code of Practice and the PSS Procedure Manual
Sameer Sheikh
Senior CCTV Officer, Control Room Operations
sameer.sheikh@redbridge.gov.uk
3.2 CCTV Projects and Infrastructure
Daniel Rawe, Senior Projects and Infrastructure Officer will be the single point of reference in relation to project and maintenance issues. The role will include a responsibility to:
- Ensure the provision and maintenance of all technical equipment forming part of the Council’s CCTV System in accordance with contractual arrangements
- Agree to any proposed alterations and additions to the CCTV System, this Code and the PSS Procedure Manual.
Daniel Rawe
Senior CCTV Officer, Projects and Infrastructure Officer
Daniel.rawe@redbridge.gov.uk
3.3 CCTV Staff
CCTV staff work under the direction of the CCTV Manager and in accordance with the policy and procedural practices.
The CCTV staff have responsibility for:
- day-to-day operation of the system, including the Town watch radio, in accordance with the policy and procedural practices
- observing the civil rights of the public and individuals and respect their privacy
- taking appropriate action to deal with incidents detected, in accordance with the procedures laid down by the policy and record such information as required in the appropriate log
- proficient in the control of cameras and operation of all equipment forming part of the system. They should acquire a good knowledge of the area by the cameras and ensure that information recorded or obtained by the system is accurate, adequate, relevant and does not exceed that necessary to fulfil the purpose of the system. The system is managed by the Head of Community Protection and Licensing, Sasha Taylor.
-
Primary System Control
Only those authorised members of staff, authorised police officers or persons maintaining the system, will have access to the operating controls. The CCTV control room staff will have primacy of control at all times. However, see operation of the system by the police below.
-
Secondary control
Secondary monitoring and control facilities are installed at the Police Central Command Complex at Bow. Subject to permission being granted by a CCTV Enforcement Officer, the police may independently control the cameras.
When secondary control or monitoring of the cameras is undertaken within the Police Central Command Complex at Bow, the police OCU Commander is responsible for ensuring compliance with this code and complying with the Data Protection Act 2018 in so far as they apply.
-
Control room management
6.1 Operational
6.1.1 Technical instructions on the use of equipment housed within the monitoring room are contained in a separate manual provided by the equipment suppliers.
6.1.2 At the start of each shift, or as soon as practicable thereafter, officer should run a check on all the system's functions by completing a camera patrol to ensure that the equipment is performing properly.
6.1.3 Actions that should be taken in the event of an incident are detailed in the procedural instructions. Further procedures for gathering and reporting intelligence on incidents and individuals will be given at the formal and ad hoc planning meetings that are held, from time to time, between the police and control room staff or management. During Redbridge Action Days, the CCTV Enforcement Officers respond to radio calls for assistance from the Enforcement Officers. The CCTV Enforcement Officers will pass on information to partners and agencies that are involved in the Redbridge Action Days.
6.2 Processing and handling recorded material
Images, which are not required for the purposes of enforcement action, should not be retained for longer than is necessary. All recorded material, whether recorded digitally, in analogue format, or as a hard copy video print, will be processed and handled strictly in accordance with this code of practice and the procedural manual.
6.3 Management of recorded material
6.3.1 Every recording created by the system has the potential for containing evidence that may be used in court and their management including, copying, transmission and release is controlled by the Data Protection Act 2018, Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, The Surveillance Camera Code of Practice 2013.
6.3.2 The control room will maintain the following registers:
- patrol log
- incident log,
- video still log,
- access and duty log,
- DVD/CD log, including viewing and removed from control room,
- log for handing over control of cameras to the police,
- requisition forms and evidence bags.
6.4 Recording
Subject to the equipment functioning properly, images from every camera will be constantly recorded through a virtual matrix and recorded onto licensed servers (Indigo).
6.5 DVD/CDs
6.5.1 To ensure the quality of recorded images, only DVD/CDs, removable hard drives or external hard drives supplied by the Council or police shall be used for downloading for evidential purposes.
6.5.2 Recorded images will be retained for a minimum period of one calendar month, after which they will automatically fall off the system.
6.6 Evidence
In the event of CCTV recordings being required for evidential purposes by the police it will only be removed from the control room for evidence with the written authority of a police officer of sergeant rank or above.
6.7 Video prints
6.7.1 A still print is a copy of an image that already exists on the recording system. They may not be made as a matter of routine but only with the written authority of the system manager or a police officer of sergeant rank or above. Prints may not be removed from the control room without the same authority.
6.7.2 A record shall be maintained of prints made and destroyed. All prints not released to the police or other agency for evidence shall be destroyed within 31 days of creation.
6.8 Viewing of recordings
Recordings should not be viewed unless necessary and the reason for this should be recorded. Recordings, other than on supervisory visits, shall only be viewed with the permission of one of the following: the data controller or system manager or a police officer of sergeant rank or above.
6.9 Police photographs
To avoid the contamination of evidence, the use of police photographs for briefing CCTV controllers shall be conducted strictly in accordance with the advice of the police. Unless otherwise advised by the police, such photographs shall not be left on display but kept in a binder or album. Such photographs shall be retained only if provided by the police for briefing purposes and shall be seen only by those individuals stipulated by the police.
6.10 Intelligence gathered by the system
A key function of the CCTV system is to gather intelligence on crimes and criminals operating in the area. Images and recordings should be controlled in the same way as any other data collected by the system.
6.11 Maintenance
The system shall be properly maintained and serviced to ensure the production and recording of clear images. Procedures for checking the system's performance and for rectifying faults and damage are to be found in the procedural manual.
Appendix B
Disclosure of Data to Third Parties
1.Introduction
1.1. CCTV is arguably one of the most powerful tools to be developed during recent years to assist with efforts to combat crime and disorder, whilst enhancing community safety. Equally, it may be regarded by some as the most potent infringement of people’s liberty. If users, owners and managers of such systems are to command the respect and support of the general public, CCTV systems must be used with the utmost probity at all times and in a manner which stands up to scrutiny by the people they are aiming to protect.
1.2. Everyone has the right to respect for their private and family life and home. Release of data to third parties must comply with the principles and guidance issued from time to time, by the Information Commissioner and other relevant bodies such as the Home Office.
2.General Policy on disclosure/sharing
2.1. Many of the lawful bases for disclosing/sharing information depend on the processing being ‘necessary’ for a specified purpose (see section 1.3 of this Code). Disclosure and/or sharing of information must be a targeted and proportionate way of achieving the purpose.
2.2. On a request for disclosure and/or sharing, the System Owner must satisfy itself that the requester has cited a specified, explicit and legitimate purpose for the disclosure and/or sharing of data to it by the System Owner. This means that the reason(s) for each instance of a disclosure (including viewing)/sharing of data must be set out clearly by the requester, including their reliance on any Data Protection legislation exemptions and justification for reliance on the exemptions.
All requests for the release of data will be processed in accordance with the PSS Procedure Manual.
2.3 Requests are likely to be made by third parties for any one or more of the following:
- to aid with the detection or prevention of crime;
- to share images/footage with Neighbourhood Officers for intelligence and evidential purposes, or to reduce or prevent environmental crimes.
iii. for reasons related to the detection and prevention of terrorism;
- to aid with the detection and prevention of non-criminal acts that are nevertheless unlawful;
- to address anti-social behaviour;
- for the purposes of actual or prospective legal proceedings, or obtaining of legal advice or establishing, exercising or defending legal rights.
vii. relevant legal representatives and insurance companies, in compliance with S35, DPA
viii. the media, where it is decided that the public's assistance is needed in order to assist in the identification of victim, witness or perpetrator in relation to a criminal incident. As part of that decision, the wishes of the victim should be taken into account
viiii. Subject Access Requests
The owner shall not unduly obstruct a bona fide third party investigation to verify the existence of
relevant data.
The owner shall not destroy data that is relevant to a previous or pending search request, which become the subject of a subpoena
- Secondary requests to view data
Requests to view data that do not fall within the above should pass the test of disclosure in the public interest. In assessing whether a disclosure is in the public interest, the owner shall balance the effect of disclosure upon the individual with the likelihood of achieving the public interest in making the disclosure.
4.Media disclosure
4.1. The Data Protection legislation exemption (Schedule 2, part 5, para 26(3) of the Data Protection Act 2018) applies to journalism but this should not be construed as an automatic blanket exemption from the Data Protection legislation - the media must still ensure they give consideration to the data protection rights of individuals.
4.2 The System Owner must be satisfied that the disclosure is lawful, sufficiently justified in the public interest and would be fair and meet the ‘legitimate interests’ condition.
4.3 If the information in question is sensitive personal data (someone’s health, sex life or allegations of criminal activity), there is a specific Data Protection legislation condition to allow a public interest disclosure to journalists if it is related to wrong doing or incompetence, but otherwise, the System Owner will need to be satisfied that one of the conditions for processing sensitive data applies.
4.4 The key is proportionality. It is a balancing act – if there is a serious privacy intrusion or risk of harm, the media will need to demonstrate or establish a significant public interest to justify the disclosure.
4.5The Data Protection legislation does not oblige the System Owner to disclose information to the media, if it disagrees with the media’s view of the public interest, or if the System Owner has other overriding legal, professional or reputational reasons to refuse to disclose the information.
4.6 Before disclosing information to the media, the System Owner must ensure that the request cites an appropriate public interest justification.
5.Disclosure to insurance or legal agencies
5.1 CCTV footage cannot be released following a subject access request where third party individuals can be identified unless those parties have consented to the disclosure.
We may also refuse to provide footage to you whereby doing so would be likely to prejudice:
- The prevention and detection of crime
- Apprehension and prosecution of offenders
5.2 If no data is held regarding your request, or the data falls into a category exempted from disclosure, you will be notified in writing of this.
If individuals have:
- been the victim of a crime
- been involved in a road traffic collision or
- are an insurance company or legal representative
We are unable to accept subject access requests in these instances because we will only be able to provide you with images of yourself and not third parties.
5.3 Victims of crime, or crime-related incidents should be reported to the police by calling either 999 in an emergency or 101 in a non-emergency. The police can make a request direct to CCTV to view footage and, if held, it will be provided to the investigating officer.
5.4 If involved in a road traffic collision, insurance company requests for footage fall under the Data Protection Regulations 2018, Schedule 2 Part 1 (5) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/schedule/2/enacted (as the GDPR Provisions do not apply). Authorities can apply a discretionary charge for this service by virtue of Section 93(1) of the Local Government Act 2003. To obtain footage containing all parties subject to the collision, requests are subject to the following charges:
CCTV Footage Review/Search Fee for (Registered) Insurance Companies, Solicitors or Claims Companies - £200.00 (plus VAT)
CCTV Footage Release Fee for (Registered) Insurance Companies, Solicitors or Claims Companies - Up to one hour £228.00 (plus VAT), Up to 1.5hrs - £282.00 (plus VAT), 2-8hrs hours £336.00 (plus VAT).
Payment options (card payment/BACS) are available via the Councils on-line payment facility. No footage will be reviewed or released until payment has been processed.
The disclosure of recorded data will be on the authority of the CCTV Supervisor and dealt with in accordance with the PSS Procedure Manual.
All requests will be recorded.
6.Disclosure to the Police
The disclosure of recorded data will be on the authority of the CCTV Supervisor and dealt with in accordance with the Public Space Procedure Manual.
Requisition forms must be completed and submitted which will cite a specified, explicit and legitimate purpose for the disclosure/sharing of data to it by the System Owner. This means that the reason(s) for each instance of a disclosure (including viewing)/sharing of data must be set out clearly by the Police, including their reliance on any Data Protection legislation exemptions and justification for reliance on the exemptions.
Requisitions must have authority from Police Sergeant or above to prevent any inappropriate or spurious requests for footage. No footage will be disclosed or issued to any police officer without an authorised requisition form being submitted to the Control Room.
Footage will only be issued in the presence of an attending police officer.
- CCTV request for individuals (Subject Access Requests)
You have the right to request CCTV footage of yourself under Article 15 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). You have a right to be provided with images of yourself, if we hold them, but not of any third parties.
If you require CCTV footage of yourself that you believe may have been captured by cameras owned by the council, please complete the CCTV footage request form. To help us to identify the footage you require, please ensure you provide the following identifying information, where applicable:
- The date and time of the requested footage
- The precise location of the requested footage
- The make, model, colour and registration number of your vehicle (if required footage involves your vehicle)
- A description of yourself to aid the CCTV Enforcement Officer to locate footage of you
- Any further descriptive details you feel are relevant to your application
There is no charge for processing a subject access request application. However, where the request is manifestly unfounded or excessive, a reasonable fee for the administrative costs of complying with requests may be charged and requesters will be advised accordingly.
So that identification can be made, prior to releasing any CCTV footage containing personal data, photographic identity of the requester will be required, this may include, but not limited to;
- current passport
- driving licence
- student card.
Please note: CCTV footage is held by the council for a period of 30 days only. Any footage requested beyond this time limit will not be available.
Please be aware that while some of our cameras are fixed to a specific view, cameras are moved routinely for CCTV operation and patrols. This means footage of an incident may not always be captured as cameras may be set on a differing default to incident location.
8.Compensation
Individuals who suffer unwarranted damage or distress as a result of any contravention of the requirements of the 2018 Data Protection Act are entitled to go to court to seek compensation in certain circumstances. This right to claim compensation for a breach of the act is in addition to an individual's right to request the Data Protection Commissioner to make an assessment as to whether or not processing is likely to comply with the act.
Appendix C Declaration of Confidentiality – CCTV System Operators
The Redbridge Borough Council CCTV System
I confirm that I am employed as a CCTV Enforcement Officer.
I have received a copy of the Code of Practice in respect of the operation and management of the Redbridge Borough Council’s CCTV System.
I confirm that I am conversant with the content of that Code of Practice. I understand that all duties, which I undertake in connection with the Redbridge Borough Council’s CCTV System, must not contravene any part of that Code of Practice, or any future amendments to it, of which I am made aware. I undertake that if I am, or become unclear, of any aspect of the operation of the CCTV System or the content of the Code of Practice, I will seek clarification from my manager.
I understand that it is a condition of my employment that I do not disclose or divulge any information which I have acquired in the course of, or in connection with, my duties to the media. This includes information obtained verbally or in writing or by any other means, now or in the future. I understand that this prohibition remains binding after I have ceased to be retained in connection with the CCTV System.
In signing this declaration, I agree to abide by, and be bound by, the Code of Practice. I understand and agree to maintain confidentiality in respect of all information gained during the course of my duties, now, or in the future.
Signed: …....................................... Print Name: .................................…….
Witness: …….................................. Position: .......................................……
Dated this ……………. (Day) of ….........................…. (Month). 20……………..
Revised April 2020
Appendix D Declaration of Confidentiality - Lay Visitors
I am a Lay Visitor of the Redbridge Borough Council’s CCTV System with a responsibility to monitor the operation of the System and adherence to the Code of Practice. I have received a copy of the Code in respect of the operation and management of that CCTV System.
I confirm that I am fully conversant with my voluntary duties and the content of the Code of Practice. I undertake to inform the Designated Officers of any apparent contravention of the Code of Practice that I may note during the course of my visits to the monitoring facility.
If now, or in the future I am, or I become unclear of any aspect of the operation of the CCTV System or the content of the Code of Practice, I undertake to seek clarification of such uncertainties.
I understand that it is a condition of my duties that I do not disclose or divulge any information which I have acquired in the course of, or in connection with, my position as a Lay Visitor to any company, authority, agency, other organisation or any individual. This includes information obtained verbally, in writing or by any other media, now or in the future. I understand that this prohibition remains binding after I have ceased to perform duties as a Lay Visitor.
In signing this declaration, I agree to abide by, and be bound by, the Code of Practice. I understand and agree to maintain confidentiality in respect of all information gained during the course of my voluntary duties, now, or in the future.
Signed: .................................................. Print Name: ..........................................
Witness: ................................................ Position: ...............................................
Dated the .....……(Day) of.………………………….(Month) 20……
Appendix E Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act Guiding Principles
Advice and Guidance for Control Room Staff and Police Inspectors in respect of CCTV and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 relates to surveillance by the Police and other agencies and deals in part with the use of directed covert surveillance.
Section 26 of this Act sets out what is Directed Surveillance. It defines this type of surveillance as:
‘Subject to subsection (6), surveillance is directed for the purposes of this Part if it is covert but not intrusive and is undertaken:
(a) for the purposes of a specific investigation or a specific operation
(b) in such a manner as is likely to result in the obtaining of private information about a person (whether or not one specifically identified for the purposes of the investigation or operation) and
(c) otherwise than by way of an immediate response to events or circumstances the nature of which is such that it would not be reasonably practicable for an authorisation under this Part to be sought for the carrying out of the surveillance
CCTV being used intrusively will be authorised other than by this section of the RIPA Act. Appropriate guidelines already exist for intrusive surveillance.
The impact for staff in the Police control rooms and CCTV monitoring centres is that there might be cause to monitor for some time a person or premises using the cameras. In most cases, this will fall into sub section (c) above, i.e. it will be an immediate response to events or circumstances. In this case, it would not require authorisation unless it were to continue for some time. The Code says some hours rather than minutes.
In cases where a pre-planned incident or operation wishes to make use of CCTV for such monitoring, an authority will almost certainly be required.
Slow time requests are authorised by a Police Superintendent or above.
If an authorisation is required immediately, a Police Inspector may do so. The forms in both cases must indicate the reason and should fall within one of the following categories:
An authorisation is necessary on grounds falling within this subsection if it is necessary:
(a) in the interests of national security
(b) for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime or of preventing disorder
(c) in the interests of the economic well-being of the United Kingdom
(d) in the interests of public safety
(e) for the purpose of protecting public health
(f) for the purpose of assessing or collecting any tax, duty, levy or other imposition, contribution or charge payable to a government department or
(g) for any purpose (not falling within paragraph (a) to (f)) which is specified for the purposes of this subsection by an order made by the Secretary of State
In cases where there is doubt as to whether an authorisation is required or not, it may be prudent to obtain the necessary authority verbally, followed by written confirmation using the forms. Any authority given should be recorded appropriately for later reference. This should include the name of the officer authorising.
Examples:
Inspector’s Authorisation
An example of a request requiring an Inspector’s authorisation might be where a car is found in a car park late at night and is known to belong to drug dealers. The officers might task CCTV to watch the vehicle over a period of time to note who goes to and from the vehicle.
Superintendent’s Authorisation
An example here might be where it is suspected that shop premises are being utilised for dealing in stolen goods and crime squad officers wish to use CCTV to monitor the premises from the outside for a period of days.
No Authorisation Required
An example might be where officers chance upon local drug dealers sitting in the town centre and, in order not to divulge that observation is taking place, ask for CCTV to monitor them.
Appendix F - Public Space Systems and Directed Surveillance
1.1. On occasion, the Metropolitan Police and other enforcement agencies, may need to use public space CCTV systems operated by the local authorities in police operations in circumstances that may require authorisation under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA).
1.2. The Office of Surveillance Commissioners (OSC) Procedures and Guidance (December 2008) states: “It is recommended that a law enforcement agency should obtain a written protocol with a local authority if the latter’s CCTV system is to be used for Directed Surveillance. Any such protocol should be drawn up centrally in order to ensure a unified approach. The protocol should include a requirement that the local authority should see the authorisation (redacted if necessary to prevent the disclosure of sensitive information) and only allow its equipment to be used in accordance with it.”
1.3. CCTV schemes operated by local authorities are intended primarily to carry out overt surveillance for the safety and reassurance of the public. The overt operation of CCTV schemes and co-operation between the local authorities and Metropolitan Police and other enforcement agencies in response to incidents does not require authorisation under RIPA and is not subject to this Protocol. The overt use of CCTV is governed by the Data Protection legislation and the CCTV Code of Practice published by the Information Commissioner’s Office.
1.4. RIPA is permissive legislation that allows law enforcement agencies and public authorities to carry out surveillance. The Act defines two categories of surveillance activity, directed surveillance and intrusive surveillance.
1.5. As public authorities specified by the act, police forces and local authorities are able to carry out surveillance authorised under RIPA. Where two public authorities are working together an authorisation obtained by one authority can cover the activities of the other. Therefore, it is not necessary for local authorities to obtain their own authorisation when they are acting in support of the police.
1.6. However, advice from the Office of Surveillance Commissioners states that: “Local authorities have a keen interest in ensuring that authorisations are properly implemented even when acting on behalf of others, such as the police, since the product is primarily theirs and it maybe they who receive the complaints or claims in the case of misuse.”
1.7. To enable the relevant local authority to fulfil this duty the Metropolitan Police will provide the local authority with sufficient information to demonstrate that proper authorisation is in place.
2.Directed Surveillance
2.1. Directed Surveillance is surveillance that is covert but not intrusive and is undertaken:
- For the purposes of a specific investigation or a specific operation;
- In such a manner as is likely to result in the obtaining of private information about a person (whether or not one specifically identified for the purposes of the investigation or operation); and
- Otherwise than by way of an immediate response to events or circumstances the nature of which is such that it would not be reasonably practicable for an authorisation under this Part to be sought for the carrying out of the surveillance.
2.2. The day-to-day use of public space CCTV systems does not normally require authorisation under RIPA. This is because the cameras are not covert and the targeting of any individual person for surveillance is by way of immediate response to events.
2.3. However, where CCTV cameras are used as part of a planned covert operation, to carry out surveillance of an identified individual or a location, in a way that is likely to obtain private information about any person, then an authorisation for directed surveillance is likely to be required.
2.4. Where Metropolitan Police and other enforcement agency is planning to carry out surveillance with the cooperation of the local authority using a CCTV system, Metropolitan Police and other enforcement agencies will obtain the authorisation.
3.Intrusive Surveillance
3.1. It is highly unlikely that Metropolitan Police and other enforcement agencies will ever seek assistance from a local authority to carry out intrusive surveillance using a public CCTV system. The main purpose of including the information in this section is to make clear the limitations of what can be done under an authorisation for directed surveillance.
3.2. Intrusive Surveillance is surveillance that:
- Is carried out in relation to anything taking place on any residential premises or in any private vehicle; and
- Involves the presence of an individual on the premises or in the vehicle or is carried out by means of a surveillance device.
3.3. For the purposes of this part of RIPA surveillance which:
- Is carried out by means of a surveillance device in relation to anything taking place on any residential premises or in any private vehicle, but
- Is carried out without the device being present on the premises or in the vehicle, is not intrusive unless the device is such that it consistently provides information of the same quality and detail as might be expected to be obtained from a device actually present on the premises or in the vehicle.
3.4. It should be noted that a view into residential premises or a private vehicle is not necessarily intrusive surveillance as defined in RIPA. For example, a chance view through a window would not render surveillance intrusive, the issue for consideration is whether information of the same quality and detail as from a device inside the premises would be obtained. However, if the sole purpose of the surveillance is to consider residential premises this is likely to be intrusive.
3.5. Local authorities are not empowered to authorise intrusive surveillance, but they may provide operational support to a police operation, where the authorisation allows this. Therefore, if the need for such support is foreseen, it should be specified in the authorisation. However as stated in paragraph 3.1, it is highly unlikely that such a request would ever be made.
4.Authorisation Procedure
4.1. There will be two distinct circumstances where police will make an approach to a local authority to request the use of their CCTV facility for directed surveillance.
- A pre-planned operation with a Superintendent’s written authority.
- An unplanned urgent operation with a Superintendent’s verbal authority or an Inspector’s written authority.
4.2. In a pre-planned operation, it is recommended that prior to making an application for directed surveillance involving the use of a CCTV system, the police applicant should contact the CCTV manager to discuss the feasibility of the proposed surveillance and to reach agreement in principle as to what can be achieved. This discussion and the subsequent application should include:
- Why directed surveillance is required.
- What CCTV will capture.
- What the role of the CCTV Enforcement Officer will be.
- When the surveillance is anticipated to start and end.
4.3. The wording on the police application and authorisation form must encompass the use of the CCTV system e.g. “Static surveillance and the technical means necessary to monitor and record such surveillance”.
4.4. Before the surveillance commences the police, applicant will provide the CCTV Manager with a copy of the signed authority, redacted if necessary to protect sensitive operational information.
4.5. In an unplanned urgent operation, the police applicant will provide the CCTV Manager with the following information:
- The names of the applicant and authorising officer
- The date and time of the authorisation and expiry (72hrs).
- Details of the nature of the surveillance authorised that relates to CCTV.
- Details of the persons (known or unknown) who are subject of the surveillance.
- A copy of the signed authority will be provided within 3 working days.
4.6. In both planned and unplanned urgent operations, the police applicant will subsequently provide the CCTV Manager with:
- Details of any changes (e.g. addition or removal of subjects), resulting from any REVIEW of the authority.
- A copy of any RENEWAL of the authority (redacted if necessary).
- A copy of the CANCELLATION of the authority (redacted if necessary).
5.Conduct of Surveillance
5.1. Care must be taken to ensure that where surveillance is authorised under RIPA the surveillance subsequently carried out does not exceed what is authorised.
5.2. The police officers and local authority staff involved in carrying out surveillance under this protocol must be fully briefed about the extent of the surveillance authorised and that it must not be exceeded.
5.3. If during the course of the surveillance it becomes apparent that the circumstances have changed to the extent that the original authorisation is no longer sufficient, the police officer in charge of the surveillance and the senior CCTV Enforcement Officer present should consider whether the change in circumstances is part of the original operation. If it is not, they should consider whether surveillance could continue without authorisation as an immediate response to events, see paragraph 2.1(c) above. If continued surveillance is not in immediate response to events a further authority should be obtained, verbally if appropriate.
- Product of Surveillance
6.1. In most circumstances the product of the surveillance will be visual images captured on videotape or as digitally recorded files. Police officers may also keep a written surveillance log.
6.2. The requirement to retain the product will vary depending on the nature of the surveillance. In the case of the surveillance of an individual suspected of involvement in crime it is likely that all images of the individual and associates will need to be retained.
6.3. The police officers carrying out the surveillance will specify the material that is required as evidence or as part of surveillance records.
6.4. The local authority staff will supply recordings of the material requested in a format that can be viewed by the police and at court.
6.5. Evidence obtained during planned surveillance should be treated in the same manner as evidence obtained during the normal operation of the scheme. The Code of Practice that accompanies the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 contains guidance on the period that evidence should be retained.
6.6. In the case of material retained as evidence of a crime, or as part of surveillance records, the investigating officer will be responsible for arranging the destruction of the material when it is no longer required.
- Sensitive Cases
In cases that require a high level of secrecy Metropolitan Police and other enforcement agencies should contact a designated senior manager within the local authority to discuss any special arrangements that may be required.
- Disclosure
8.1. The Data Protection legislation provides numerous exemptions in respect of personal data (see section 3.4 above).
8.2. The Freedom of Information Act 2000 gives a general right of access to all types of recorded information held by public authorities. The Act sets out exemptions from that right.
8.3. In the event of requests under the Data Protection Act or the Freedom of Information Act for access to data held by the local authority in respect of surveillance carried out jointly with Metropolitan Police and other enforcement agencies, the local authority should seek guidance from them as to whether disclosure would prejudice the investigation of crime.
8.4. It is important that any response to such enquiries does not disclose by inference whether or not surveillance has taken place. It may seem harmless where surveillance has not taken place to respond to that effect, however by doing this any other response on another occasion would indicate that it had taken place.
9.Conduct within CCTV suites
9.1. Police officers attending CCTV suites within police, local authority or other premises will identify themselves fully and show their warrant cards when in plain clothes.
9.2. Police officers will book in and out of the suite and comply with the local procedures within the suite as directed by the CCTV Manager and staff in attendance.
10.Complaints
10.1. Complaints received by Metropolitan Police and other enforcement agencies concerning the ‘Direction and Control of the force’ over the use of surveillance, which has included the use of a local authority CCTV system, will be dealt with in accordance with Metropolitan Police and other enforcement agencies policies and procedures.
10.2. Complaints that relate specifically to the conduct of a police officer or a member of police staff are complaints subject to the Police Reform Act 2002 and will be dealt with by the Professional Standards Department.
10.3. Complaints under section 65, Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, concerning surveillance that has taken place in ‘challengeable circumstances’ will be referred to the Investigative Powers Tribunal.
10.4. Metropolitan Police and other enforcement agencies will inform the local authority whenever any complaint is received relating to the use of surveillance, which has included the use of a local authority CCTV system, and of the outcome of any investigation, but not including complaints of conduct matters falling within the Police Reform Act.
10.5. In the event of any complaint being received by the local authority about surveillance that has been initiated by Metropolitan Police and other enforcement agencies, The Authority should refer to their respective Professional Standards Department to discuss the investigation of the complaint.
10.6. Local authorities may carry out their own investigations, in doing so they should have regard for the potential compromise of criminal investigations and whether any matters are subjudice.